From acc67744c0ed571c0ecaebef819bedbfca773a0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 04:42:35 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Remove obsolete tip referring to 2010 removal of TAP numbers.
Remove a tip describing the discouraged use of TAP numbers, and how
these numbers would be removed by mid-2010.
Change-Id: Iebe7e2e4a0f8e1f18a91d7935588dd9ced2b398d
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/1862
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
---
doc/openocd.texi | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/openocd.texi b/doc/openocd.texi
index 3781a3989..425e4393d 100644
--- a/doc/openocd.texi
+++ b/doc/openocd.texi
@@ -3726,17 +3726,6 @@ The components of a dotted name should follow ``C'' symbol
name rules: start with an alphabetic character, then numbers
and underscores are OK; while others (including dots!) are not.
-@quotation Tip
-In older code, JTAG TAPs were numbered from 0..N.
-This feature is still present.
-However its use is highly discouraged, and
-should not be relied on; it will be removed by mid-2010.
-Update all of your scripts to use TAP names rather than numbers,
-by paying attention to the runtime warnings they trigger.
-Using TAP numbers in target configuration scripts prevents
-reusing those scripts on boards with multiple targets.
-@end quotation
-
@section TAP Declaration Commands
@c shouldn't this be(come) a {Config Command}?
--
GitLab